Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:40 pm
I play mostly in franchise leagues, the majority of them started by Andy Cummings. All of them involve multi-season commitments, usually 12, in which everyone rotates through the 12 teams finally selected. That is by far the most fair method. not to mention the most challenging. And each of the leagues has strict rules as to which players are eligible for each franchise, either by chronology (say, 1967-92 cards only), or price (say, most expensive card wins when players are carded to, or played for, more than one franchise), or specifically assigned by the commissioner to a franchise for which they would otherwise be ineligible.
One franchise league started by warrenbob is somewhat similar to your intentions toward the Yankees: Each of the other 11 franchises (all of the original 16 teams except for the Senators, Browns, Phillies and Pirates) in the league are ranked according to strength. The six lowest ranked get to add three players from the expansion teams, NeL or the four unchosen franchises) in non-serpentine rounds. The four middle-ranked teams get to add two players in the second and third rounds while the Giants (ranked second in strength) get to add only one player at the end of the third round. The Yankees, of course, get no such free agents.
There are many different ways to organize such leagues, but the object should be to make them competitive no matter how the franchises are selected. As Harry points out, it is almost mandatory to lay out strict eligibility rules.