Mon Aug 15, 2016 12:05 pm
### STOP THE DRAFT ###
Fellas, I need your help. There is a potential problem ahead of us that I spotted recently. I thought it would not come until the 70's, but today George informed me he has already bumped up against it. It deals with this league rule:
If high salaries keep a manager from completing his 20-man roster, franchise players will be replaced with non-franchise players valued at $1M or less, until salary requirements are met. The dropped players are still eligible to be recalled later as desired. The same rule applies if a manager is unable to fill the last five spots (non-franchise player) on his roster.
The issue is, should there be restrictions on what players can be dropped. Can a manager drop six $2.5m players to pick up $1m players, leaving cap space for big-name free agents? If so, what does this do to the look of a franchise? Also, do the replacement players (when less than 20 franchise players) become franchise players? Or can they be dropped and replaced like Players 21-25?
I don't for a second think any of our current managers would "game" the system. It's mainly a matter of clarity. I discussed this at the ballpark with John Recupero, and he concurred there might be a problem.
So . . . I'm asking for three of you to put your heads together and help me with this particular rule. Please let me know if you are willing to help. I'll appoint a chairperson and let you report back before we move ahead.
Sorry! I know we want to get goIng, but let's get this out of the way first.
Thanks,
Paul