- Posts: 594
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 11:21 am
I don't know if I have one explanation, but your team illustrates something I wanted to write about in the forum.
If all 12 teams draft 4 *SP, and if all 12 teams put their ace at the first game, then the aces will always face each other, the #2 will always face #2, etc, because the schedule is balanced (3 games every day). And from what I can see, most owners do put their ace at the #1 and follow that logic--of course 5-men rotation don't follow that pattern, but they are less frequent in ATG.
But there MUST be at least one team in there for which setting an ace in the #1 spot is NOT the best strategy. There MUST be one team whose best strategy should be to put their #4 against everyone's ace, and then have the better edge in all other three matchups. I say "MUST", but I don't have any proof, it just seems to me that everything must not balance out.
IF I look at your team, Keefe didn't have his best season (ERA=4.89), but he also had by far the worst support from your offense, which is not surprising considering that he almost always faced a top ace. Looking around the league, Keefe was also one of the weaker ace. Clarkson, your #4, had an incredible run support, again as expected because he faced the worse starters in the league regularly, but he only turned a 17-12 out of it because of a 6.71 era. So I wonder how your record would turn out with the same pitchers, but with a different front.