Cool all-time franchise year lge. Loading West!!!!

Moderator: Palmtana

  • Author
  • Message
Offline

centerfielder17

  • Posts: 2219
  • Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 3:53 am

Re: Any interest in doing another version of this concept?

PostSat Dec 10, 2016 9:40 pm

Cf17 will try the 61 Yanks
Offline

Musial6

  • Posts: 2327
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:56 pm

Re: Any interest in doing another version of this concept?

PostSun Dec 11, 2016 8:00 am

rolandzeut wrote:I agree that Rizzuto (or Collins) shouldn't be used. I vote to keep the rules from the previous league, only allowing teams to add sub $1 players to that years team carded players...also no trades.



I agree. But the selection of the 61 Yanks by CF17 makes this a moot point as far as wanting to put Rizzuto on the 56 Yanks, doesn't it? Because unfortunately, this league won't be able to support both of those teams - too many crossover players - Mantle, Berra, etc.

But for any other similar situations, I agree with rolandzeut that the original rules should be followed.
Offline

Musial6

  • Posts: 2327
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:56 pm

Re: Any interest in doing another version of this concept?

PostSun Dec 11, 2016 8:01 am

PostFri Dec 09, 2016 12:21 pm
1. davesodu - Philly A's 1929
2. Hittmens- chicago ws 1919
3. musial6 - NY Yankees 1927
4. gbrookes - Toronto Blue Jays 1985
5. 2cityfan - Indians 1954
6. Brent65 - NY Yankees 1939 (edited)
7. rolandzeut - Mets 1986
8. salmonbellies - Pittsburgh 1927
9.Expos1981...1953 Brooklyn Dodgers
10.Yountfan 1909 Detroit Tigers
11.CF17 - 1961 New York Yankees
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
Offline

YountFan

  • Posts: 1265
  • Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:18 pm

Re: Any interest in doing another version of this concept?

PostSun Dec 11, 2016 10:31 am

In looking over the 1909 Tigers it will be a tough road against the non deadball teams. Outside of Bush, Crawford and Cobb there is not much hitting. I remember playing with this team as a young man and they seem to do pretty well. Last tome I had the 27 Pirates and ended up 81-81 but they had more hitting. I'll need to really look at the sub million dollar players for some hitters

This will be fun. Come on to Detroit and pad your record
Posted by the real YountFan
Offline

centerfielder17

  • Posts: 2219
  • Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 3:53 am

Re: Any interest in doing another version of this concept?

PostSun Dec 11, 2016 11:09 am

Any restrictions on what ballpark you use?
Offline

Brent65

  • Posts: 211
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:41 pm

Re: Any interest in doing another version of this concept?

PostSun Dec 11, 2016 11:31 am

Rules are on 1st page of thread:
5) Teams can pick any stadium (I thought it was easier to deal this without requirement, as some teams don'T have an assigned stadium
Offline

edwardneal63

  • Posts: 387
  • Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 1:40 am

Re: Any interest in doing another version of this concept?

PostSun Dec 11, 2016 3:09 pm

1. davesodu - Philly A's 1929
2. Hittmens- chicago ws 1919
3. musial6 - NY Yankees 1927
4. gbrookes - Toronto Blue Jays 1985
5. 2cityfan - Indians 1954
6. Brent65 - NY Yankees 1939 (edited)
7. rolandzeut - Mets 1986
8. salmonbellies - Pittsburgh 1927
9.Expos1981...1953 Brooklyn Dodgers
10.Yountfan 1909 Detroit Tigers
11.CF17 - 1961 New York Yankees
12.Ed2014 - Seattle Mariners 2001
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
Offline

gbrookes

  • Posts: 5343
  • Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:24 am

Re: Any interest in doing another version of this concept?

PostSun Dec 11, 2016 6:12 pm

Musial6 wrote:
rolandzeut wrote:I agree that Rizzuto (or Collins) shouldn't be used. I vote to keep the rules from the previous league, only allowing teams to add sub $1 players to that years team carded players...also no trades.



I agree. But the selection of the 61 Yanks by CF17 makes this a moot point as far as wanting to put Rizzuto on the 56 Yanks, doesn't it? Because unfortunately, this league won't be able to support both of those teams - too many crossover players - Mantle, Berra, etc.

But for any other similar situations, I agree with rolandzeut that the original rules should be followed.


I don't want to go to the trouble of running a poll. If two players are opposed to the possible rule change then we'll just go with the original rules - especially since Rizzuto is now a moot point
Offline

Musial6

  • Posts: 2327
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:56 pm

Re: Any interest in doing another version of this concept?

PostMon Dec 12, 2016 10:32 am

1. davesodu - Philly A's 1929
2. Hittmens- chicago ws 1919
3. musial6 - NY Yankees 1927
4. gbrookes - Toronto Blue Jays 1985
5. 2cityfan - Indians 1954
6. Brent65 - NY Yankees 1939 (edited)
7. rolandzeut - Mets 1986
8. salmonbellies - Pittsburgh 1927
9.Expos1981...1953 Brooklyn Dodgers
10.Yountfan 1909 Detroit Tigers
11.CF17 - 1961 New York Yankees
12.Ed2014 - Seattle Mariners 2001
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
Offline

gbrookes

  • Posts: 5343
  • Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:24 am

Re: Any interest in doing another version of this concept?

PostMon Dec 12, 2016 7:36 pm

centerfielder17 wrote:Any restrictions on what ballpark you use?


1. Honor System:
2. If at all possible, use a ballpark from the same general era for your selected franchise year (and the particular year, or close to it, if possible)
3. If #2 isn't possible, please try to use a ballpark that is at least generally consistent (in character and era) with your selected franchise year
4. declare your chosen park on these boards in order to avoid duplicates if possible
PreviousNext

Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: All-Time Greats

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: nol15736 and 23 guests