- Posts: 1279
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:04 am
Thanks Rick. It would be foolish of SOM not to monitor the forums, as it is important to know the feelings of the customers so that products and services can be more tailored to their needs. While I know my posts are lengthy, I write them with the thought that such are being read by SOM officials.
Regarding LANCETUCKER's suggestion about sending SOM a "blitz of emails" from the community about the suggestion, the idea is strong enough to stand on its own without such and I don't want to impose one more hurdle against implementation when the email blitz fails to occur. Rick has not only done a great job over the years balancing his own ideas about the tourney with those suggested by the playing community for the betterment of all involved, but he has been a tireless advocate for perks from SOM for tourney participants, which have increased tournament participation, and, not coincidentally, revenue for SOM. This is one more idea along those lines.
While I don't think that anyone could more strongly advocate for this idea than me, I'm glad that you are on board, Rick, and I'm comfortable with the thought of you presenting the idea to SOM, as I believe you have your finger on the pulse of the playing community and are able to understand that it is important to maintain the balance between the best interests of the playing community and the continued viability of the ATG game, in addition to having one thing I don't, being the ear of SOM honchos. Let's hope that they view the proposal in a favorable light, seeing it as a great opportunity to increase the participation level and revenue of the ATG game at little or no additional cost. As I've said all along, it's a win-win situation.
Regarding LANCETUCKER's suggestion about sending SOM a "blitz of emails" from the community about the suggestion, the idea is strong enough to stand on its own without such and I don't want to impose one more hurdle against implementation when the email blitz fails to occur. Rick has not only done a great job over the years balancing his own ideas about the tourney with those suggested by the playing community for the betterment of all involved, but he has been a tireless advocate for perks from SOM for tourney participants, which have increased tournament participation, and, not coincidentally, revenue for SOM. This is one more idea along those lines.
While I don't think that anyone could more strongly advocate for this idea than me, I'm glad that you are on board, Rick, and I'm comfortable with the thought of you presenting the idea to SOM, as I believe you have your finger on the pulse of the playing community and are able to understand that it is important to maintain the balance between the best interests of the playing community and the continued viability of the ATG game, in addition to having one thing I don't, being the ear of SOM honchos. Let's hope that they view the proposal in a favorable light, seeing it as a great opportunity to increase the participation level and revenue of the ATG game at little or no additional cost. As I've said all along, it's a win-win situation.