I wait until game 54, one-third of the way through the season, to first assess my teams, which is where we are now. These Oberlin Tigers are the third iteration of the team for 2016. The first two versions went 94-68 (+202; +95 run differentials) and won championships:
http://365.strat-o-matic.com/team/1451967http://365.strat-o-matic.com/team/1458387All the position players against RHP and LHP are the same, with only the DH changing (Joyce; Naquin/Semien; V. Martinez), and the backup 3B in this version being K. Johnson instead of M. Gonzalez.
Starting pitchers (after my early season adjustment) have been three high-end SP* (Porcello [3x], Arrieta [3x], Lester [2x], or Kluber), and one low-end SP* (Moore, Stroman, or Nolasco).
Among relief pitchers, Ryan, Smith, and Biagini have been constants, with Familia replaced with Kintzler (a result of initially having five SP) as closer on the latest team.
These teams were constructed based on the ratings of Marc Pelletier, which I started using in 2015 (three teams, three playoffs, one championship), after his article in the Ultimate Strat Baseball Bulletin. These teams tend to have low OBP but high SLG with OPS(AVG) of .795/.745 (third in runs scored) and .796/.735 (first in runs scored). Right now, Soto, Kipnis, Cozart, and Pederson are under-performing; in constrast, Polanco is over-performing. Overall, our OPS is .768/.742, which is considerably lower than the previous teams, even if we are third in runs scored.
Among starting pitchers, Lester and Arrieta (although he won tonight) are under-performing. Previous team ERAs(AVG) have been 3.56/4.20 and third in runs allowed; and 4.10/4.02 and eighth in runs allowed, with the difference primarily a function of the ERA of starters. Currently, we have a team ERA of 4.30/4.28, and rank ninth in runs allowed. I am a little worried about Nolasco.
Previous versions were 34-20 and 31-23 after 54 games, so I thought we would have a better record than 27-27 at this point, and I certainly didn’t expect to be in last place. I am slightly more encouraged by our run differential predicting a record of 29-25, but every team in our division has an even better run differential (and better record!), although we are currently 9-9 within the division. Perhaps more troubling is that we are only 18-18 outside the division, mostly against teams with negative run differentials. In any case, we are going to stick with this team and see what happens in the next two-thirds of the season.