17.3 cards are in the set!

Moderator: Palmtana

  • Author
  • Message
Offline

Outta Leftfield

  • Posts: 804
  • Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:00 pm

Re: 17.3 cards are in the set!

PostSat Oct 28, 2017 1:10 pm

Thanks, Salty! Your efforts definitely did not go unnoticed! :D
Offline

Hack Wilson

  • Posts: 1131
  • Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:16 pm

Re: 17.3 cards are in the set!

PostSat Oct 28, 2017 7:54 pm

How can the Bonds 2004 card have a two injury??? He played 147 games. Gimme a break :evil:
Offline

george barnard

  • Posts: 2166
  • Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 1:06 pm

Re: 17.3 cards are in the set!

PostSun Oct 29, 2017 4:15 am

Hack Wilson wrote:How can the Bonds 2004 card have a two injury??? He played 147 games. Gimme a break :evil:

A 2 injury but only out for three games.
Offline

Rosie2167

  • Posts: 1975
  • Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:55 pm

Re: 17.3 cards are in the set!

PostSun Oct 29, 2017 11:12 am

george barnard wrote:
Hack Wilson wrote:How can the Bonds 2004 card have a two injury??? He played 147 games. Gimme a break :evil:

A 2 injury but only out for three games.

well he was 39 at the time.
Offline

Outta Leftfield

  • Posts: 804
  • Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 8:00 pm

Re: 17.3 cards are in the set!

PostSun Oct 29, 2017 1:42 pm

Rosie2167 wrote:
george barnard wrote:
Hack Wilson wrote:How can the Bonds 2004 card have a two injury??? He played 147 games. Gimme a break :evil:

A 2 injury but only out for three games.

well he was 39 at the time.


We've got the same thing with Dickey's 7.77 M card. 603 PA but a two injury. I guess in Dickey's case the explanation would be, "He was a catcher"--though there are many catchers who aren't 2 injury.

In any case, the injury risk for both players likely lowers the price-tag, and 7.77M Dickey does get used a lot.
Offline

Rosie2167

  • Posts: 1975
  • Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:55 pm

Re: 17.3 cards are in the set!

PostThu Nov 02, 2017 9:44 pm

rburgh wrote:Note that the old bar graphs are wrong, they are not based on any stadium. They are drilling down through the ballpark effects symbols and reading the basic game info below. Go count the HR's for anybody who played or pitched in high or low HR parks and you will see what I mean.

The best reference for card data is still the "Pool" from DD.

I have always been amazed at how poorly SOM understands the game they have been making for over 50 years.

I just got notified that the bar graphs should be fixed. I haven't confirmed that however...anyone have the chance to do so?
Offline

MARCPELLETIER

  • Posts: 1107
  • Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 11:27 pm

Re: 17.3 cards are in the set!

PostThu Nov 02, 2017 11:08 pm

Bars seem back to read the basic card.

One bug I still see is that Norris has "null" instead of "p", but he still being shown when you list pitchers, so no biggie.
Offline

RiggoDrill

  • Posts: 953
  • Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:34 am

Re: 17.3 cards are in the set!

PostMon Nov 06, 2017 11:18 pm

Hack Wilson wrote:Maybe Barry Bonds got robbed on his 2004 card -- have not yet seen the DD calculations. I always thought that was the better season than the 73 home run one in 2001. Higher OPS -- 1.421 to 1.378. Higher BA, higher OBP. Yet SOM gives Barry 2004 a salary of 11.25 compared to 14.54 for 2001. Yes, he is an 6R, but perhaps this card turns out to be a bargain, despite his defense, running. It's left field after all.


2002 is my favorite Bonds card. Used that many times in 2002 SOMO. 8-)
Previous

Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: All-Time Greats

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests