Rosie2167 wrote:All new cards except for the TB Rays team add Are now in the DD live draft.
Druid I think you just need a hug.
As you can see my post above clearly states that the TB Rays were NOT added to DD. Last I checked Wheeler was a part of that add. Once I jumped into DD I discovered none of the last 125 cards added had found their way into DD. I don't know if you've ever added a card before but it takes time, so I prioritized the other 100 to get done before the BS Finals draft.
With apologies to Moose I'm also going to take this moment to address another Druid post...
andycummings65 wrote:
Will a little bell go off when we finally have enough 5m RPs?
Ding
Once again from Andy's mouth to God's ear. I don't blame Andy for his post or trying to influence the card selection process. His interests are legitimate, as are everyone else's. My issue is with Rosie taking that feedback and then making arbitrary decisions that are counter to what the community wants. People who play higher caps, and there are more of them than play in Andy's historical leagues, want more high priced relievers, which is why we keep voting for them.
I think this whole process would be a whole lot fairer if there were some Proposed Direction Polls for each add before the actual voting for individual adds takes place. Rosie's whole analysis determining that we will add 4 SS's etc for the current add is fine as a preliminary identification of proposed directions. But the actual final decisions on who will be voted for have become Rosie's decisions, and that is not okay with me.
All the nominations are added to the master spreadsheet if they aren't on it already. I then sift through them populating the polls under the current parameters. Yes sometimes I weed a few out that either don't represent an upgrade or fall behind other cards with higher priorities (no card in set, new franchise...), far from arbitrary. I also tried (unsuccessfully) to generate ongoing discussions forums for each franchise and ERA so we could dip into those vetted lists to quickly populate a poll. You yourself signed up to be an ambassador for 4 franchises and all the ERA's, and yes you contributed some nominations through those, but unfortunately not many folks (yourself included) have kept that process afloat without prompting.
I'm now going to try a different path that will hopefully create that ongoing pulse that should make this process smoother by starting card debates by position, which now seems a more natural way of generating continued interest (something that might've been obvious to some of you already).
There is no doubt there are many holes to fill in ATG and we are getting adds at a higher rate than before, but I'm just a shepherd of this process Druid, not God, and your comment above was truly ridiculous. I don't get paid, I do however enjoy seeing the ATG set grow with fun, relevant and historically impactful cards.
I hope you can find peace man
Rosie