19.2 Results

How about some transparency?

Why not a consensus vote on the prices?

don't always agree with the committee's pricing, but that'll be the case no matter who or what ends up doing it, so to me, Im not going to complain about it.

more importantly, the process continues to take far too long imo.

believe a month is a reasonable time frame to expect the entire process to be completed.

I have no beef with the pricing being done by the committee whatsoever. I'd just like some insight as to why it takes so long to get it back to Strat.

We need to get a computer program to price the cards.

I have no beef with the pricing being done by the committee whatsoever. I'd just like some insight as to why it takes so long to get it back to Strat.

Ill give an example of a recent card that imo isn't correct:
Steve Mingori - should be almost a mill cheaper--
BUT Im glad - so other folks who want to use him a higher price- great -
there is absolutely nothing for me to complain about just because I think its too high.

OTOH- insight into why its taking so long and ways to shorten that would be great.

"OTOH- insight into why its taking so long and ways to shorten that would be great."

Amen & cheers

25 NEW PLAYERS...price 1 player a day...take off weekends and holidays...should take 5 weeks...am I missing something????

Loading the data is a labor-intensive task. I suspect the chokepoint is bandwidth of SOM support staff.

We are now FIVE months into the year, and we have ONE add out of 4. Where are the freakin' 19.2 cards?

We are now FIVE months into the year, and we have ONE add out of 4. Where are the freakin' 19.2 cards?

I think there would be a lot less frustration if we just set the following expectation.
X.1 - by the end of March
X.2 - by the end of June
X.3 - by the end of September
X.4 - by the end of December

I'm going to ask again for an update re 19.2 on Monday.

Thanks,
Bill