- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 5:21 pm
Have a 2018 team and I need to fill 1B, 2B, and LF vs. lefties with these players:
Enrique Hernandez
Ian Desmond
Ryan McMahon
Option A: Desmond (3e8) at 1B, McMahon (4e10) at 2B, and Hernandez 3(-1)e3 in LF
Option B: McMahon (4e7) at 1B, Hernandez (3e6) at 2B, and Desmond 4(-1)e7 in LF.
Outfield arm is -1 either way. Option A the errors add to 21; Option B the errors add to 20, although four more of them are in the outfield where they could go for more than one base.
With regard to range, Option A provides a 3 range instead of a 4 range at 1B and LF, but means having a 4 range instead of a 3 range at 2B. There are six GB(2B)X rolls on pitchers' cards, but only two GB(1B)X rolls and two FB(LF)X rolls, but again fielding plays that become hits in the outfield could go for more than one base, so those two LF rolls have somewhat more impact than two 2B rolls.
Any thoughts?
(It is, by the way, a league using only N.L. players, so there are no better options on the free agent list, so no need to suggest getting better fielders.)
Enrique Hernandez
Ian Desmond
Ryan McMahon
Option A: Desmond (3e8) at 1B, McMahon (4e10) at 2B, and Hernandez 3(-1)e3 in LF
Option B: McMahon (4e7) at 1B, Hernandez (3e6) at 2B, and Desmond 4(-1)e7 in LF.
Outfield arm is -1 either way. Option A the errors add to 21; Option B the errors add to 20, although four more of them are in the outfield where they could go for more than one base.
With regard to range, Option A provides a 3 range instead of a 4 range at 1B and LF, but means having a 4 range instead of a 3 range at 2B. There are six GB(2B)X rolls on pitchers' cards, but only two GB(1B)X rolls and two FB(LF)X rolls, but again fielding plays that become hits in the outfield could go for more than one base, so those two LF rolls have somewhat more impact than two 2B rolls.
Any thoughts?
(It is, by the way, a league using only N.L. players, so there are no better options on the free agent list, so no need to suggest getting better fielders.)