I thought there was already a minor, likely accidental, reveal of prices which suggested some minor decrease in certain popular reliever prices and increase in certain popular starting pitching prices.
Chompsky wrote:I thought there was already a minor, likely accidental, reveal of prices which suggested some minor decrease in certain popular reliever prices and increase in certain popular starting pitching prices.
I'm almost certain I saw Dale Murray at 5.97 somewhere.
Chompsky wrote:I thought there was already a minor, likely accidental, reveal of prices which suggested some minor decrease in certain popular reliever prices and increase in certain popular starting pitching prices.
I'm almost certain I saw Dale Murray at 5.97 somewhere.
Super advanced injuries/usage might put the kibosh on the ridiculous overusage of Rueter, Heredia, Duran, and all those other pitchers every open $80M league features somewhere.
honestiago wrote:Super advanced injuries/usage might put the kibosh on the ridiculous overusage of Rueter, Heredia, Duran, and all those other pitchers every open $80M league features somewhere.
Accurate repricing would address that. Duren is always on my draft card because of the tremendous value.
Second order effect of the repricing related to pitching overall is that starters seem to be trending as more expensive (no I have not seen a full official list). Tough to ascertain whether that accentuates or devalues pitching without knowing the overall trend for hitters, but offense is something ATG doesn't need more of.
Hoping that the early results of the super reliever changes from 20xx doesn't translate directly to ATG as well.
Nev and I both thought exactly that when we lowered the prices of starting pitchers when we repriced ATG 3 v.2. Riggo of course vehemently disagreed with this last year.
I think that a big part of the problem with offense, is that the ballpark effects are too potent. Couple that with superstar lineups and it is not a good recipe for low scoring games.