george barnard wrote:1914 Slim Sallee -- STL -- 2.10/1.148 ERA+ 133
2004 Jake Peavy -- SDP -- 2.27/1.196 ERA+ 171
1941 Al Benton -- DET -- 2.97/1.237 ERA+ 153
Andy, how would the 1943 Whit Wyatt be compared to the 1941? It would be a non*. 2.49/1.007 ERA+ 134
1914 Slim Sallee, STL, Throws-L, E BAL, END-S8*/R5
LH--2b-1.75 3b-0.60 HR-0.25 BB-4 .179/.209/.214, OPS-.424
RH--2b-1.75 3b-0.60 HR-0.30 BB-4 .176/.207/.213, OPS-.420
Current 1912 Slim Sallee, STL, Throws-L, E BAL, END-S8*/R5
LH--2b-2.25 3b-1 HR-0.25 BB-3 .197/.219/.245, OPS-.464
RH--2b-2.25 3b-1 HR-0.25 BB-3 .194/.217/.242, OPS-.459
A teeny bit better, not worth it.....
2004 Jake Peavy, SD, Throws-R, E BAL, END-S6
LH--2b-1.75 3b-1.25 HR-1.30 BB-8 .153/.216/.234, OPS-.450
RH--2b-2.00 3b-1.00 HR-1.10 BB-8 .182/.243/.255, OPS-.498
Current 2007 Jake Peavy, SD, Throws-R, 5R BAL, END-S7*
LH--2b-4.7 3b-1.2 HR-1.3 BB-9 .182/.250/.293, OPS-.543
LH--2b-0 3b-1 HR-0 BB-5 .056/.100/.076, OPS-.176
An ok card to add to the set of non*, not that great but ok
1941 Al Benton, DET, Throws-R, E BAL, END-S7/R4
LH--2b-0.2 3b-1.8 HR-1 BB-12 .104/.204/.174, OPS-.378
RH--2b-0.8 3b-0 HR-2.4 BB-10 .092/.176/.173, OPS-.350
Current 1946 Al Benton, DET, Throws-R, E BAL, END-S7/R5
LH--2b-4.4 3b-1 HR-2.2 BB-10 .200/.274/.333, OPS-.607
RH--2b-4.4 3b-1 HR-1.9 BB-10 .194/.269/.318, OPS-.587
Quite an improvement on Benton, though without the *
1943 Whit Wyatt, BKN, Throws-R, 1R BAL, END-S7
LH--2b-2 3b-0.4 HR-0.8 BB-3 .162/.186/.210, OPS-.396
LH--2b-1.8 3b-0.4 HR-0.5 BB-3 .140/.164/.179, OPS-.343
Current 1940 Whit Wyatt, BKN, Throws-R, E BAL, END-S7*
LH--2b-3.4 3b-0.8 HR-3 BB-5 .203/.240/.339, OPS-.579
LH--2b-3.4 3b-0.8 HR-3 BB-5 .203/.240/.339, OPS-.579
A good improvement for Wyatt stats-wise