- Posts: 3109
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:00 am
mlbphan wrote:I'm not sure how it happened but my team was at 41 before this draft started. So there is precedence for having that number on a roster. It doesn't mean it's appropriate though.
I think someone in this league had a roster of 43 but can’t remember who. noticed it in the drops. so is 40 not a hard limit??
I think that was a due to a trade after the season knowing that cuts would be made before the next draft etc.
I put Kikuchi back in the pool...