MAJOR FLAW VS ETHICS !!!

Reb Russell strikes out Reb Russell to win the game--that would be a great headline.

Ruth winds up and here's the pitch. Ruth crushes it to right. Ruth races back, leaps and ...makes the catch!

I sense a disturbance in the force...or a wrinkle in time...or a discontinuity in the space-time continuum...or...chaberlal--I am your father...

Oh wait...actually would be more like:
I AM YOUR FATHER!!!!!!!



IMO--it is all accounted for in the existing drop/add rules adopted when the league starts. For the case cited, no flaw. No ethical dilemma.

I you play caps $230 and BELOW.......this is NEVER a problem......thus, 95% of my leagues are $230 and below.

I would see a problem if you were trading out the 4L Bonds for the 6R Bonds on a daily basis depending on the pitching of your opponent.

This would probably be prohibitive unless the cap was very high.

Great point that is why I will not play in a league with unlimited caps

well, to be honest I have a bit of an issue with having 5 Ruth cards in the first place. They are slightly different, but I don't understand why we need 5 such similar cards. At least Hugh Duffy (as an example) has 1 card for big money and 1 for small money. Musial also. He's got mid level cards and big money. But every Ruth Card (and Bonds for that matter) is a big money card.

Did Ruth or Bonds ever have a bad season? I am glad they only have high priced cards- to draft Ruth or Bonds you need to spend at least over 8 million to list them. If they had a 2 million dollar card everyone would put them on top and you would have 12 or 24 owners drafting them