- Posts: 810
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:32 pm
Lol- dude, no. I get what the butterfly effect is.
don't get so defensive; you were given very thorough explanations of the differences
between the 2 scenarios- and yes, of course there is still a large amount of randomness,
which is how naysayers can always throw doubt on the process...but thats ignoring the
many times in the past we have found out that what was suspected was actually true.
Also no and no- presenting data is meaningless UNLESS the data has correlation...
and thats the point that has been repeatedly made, not even counting that he has a long
standing account of presenting the same data only to do an about face.
Also also - that is simply incorrect- other folks HAVE posted data - in fact Nev's opening statement IS DATA-
I mean, seriously???
_________________________________
Been there, proved that at least 8-10 times....It took "YEARS" for SOM to admit (not sure they even knew bc they're like Ray Charles leading Stevie Wonder over there) that there were bulletproof players...Think about that, Years! For those of us that were there, we remember the HUGE debates that our "anecdotally" given examples of Willie Mays NEVER missing an inning, were met with plenty of dismissive hands from the Charlies of this site.
don't get so defensive; you were given very thorough explanations of the differences
between the 2 scenarios- and yes, of course there is still a large amount of randomness,
which is how naysayers can always throw doubt on the process...but thats ignoring the
many times in the past we have found out that what was suspected was actually true.
Also no and no- presenting data is meaningless UNLESS the data has correlation...
and thats the point that has been repeatedly made, not even counting that he has a long
standing account of presenting the same data only to do an about face.
Also also - that is simply incorrect- other folks HAVE posted data - in fact Nev's opening statement IS DATA-
I mean, seriously???
_________________________________
Been there, proved that at least 8-10 times....It took "YEARS" for SOM to admit (not sure they even knew bc they're like Ray Charles leading Stevie Wonder over there) that there were bulletproof players...Think about that, Years! For those of us that were there, we remember the HUGE debates that our "anecdotally" given examples of Willie Mays NEVER missing an inning, were met with plenty of dismissive hands from the Charlies of this site.