Every One of My 13 100+ Win Teams in ATG9

The odds of seeing a 2-19 team versus a 5-15 team is 300 times less likely. You have a bunch of those?

Probabilities based on math - no one will pay any attention.

Now if I post there are multiple owners with 30 straight 100 win teams defeated in the playoffs or that SOM was caught in lies 10-15 times, then that’s the kind of solid proof everyone can get behind.

why do you entirely ignore the part of 'SOM has been caught in lies 10 times' in the exact same types of scenarios that we are discussing here?

Why does unrelated MLB data count more than actual data from the game we are actually playing???

can absolutely fathom people disagreeing with whats being said-
what I can't fathom are people who disagree using really poor rationale behind the guise of unrelated or at best poorly related 'data'.

OMG you can't make this up this is the ultimate in comedy!!!! The proof he was stating would be accepted was a POST ( a word you convienently dropped above) that there were 10 or 11 lies Stratomatic got caught in or a POST that I had 30 of 31 100 win teams lose in the playoffs.

You guys are funny.

As apposed to statistical data, which anyone can see and test.

Oh my gosh, Chuckles.

You aren't 'getting' it even remotely.
Its not the statistic of how many times SoM lied- its just the FACT that they did.
Even once- Duh.

The other mistaken assumption is that we who know the original poster have zero reason to even consider that he would be inventing said statistic- just bc YOU can't see it doesn't me we don't trust it. DUH.
Yes, as opposed to you worshiping at the trough of unrelated MLB stats, just bc you can look them up.

You keep looking at the forest and seeing a leaf. Big picture thinking dude.
Statistics that you trust- lmao, how utterly ignorant. You actually have to input things that matter.