- Posts: 569
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:53 pm
gkhd11a wrote:nevdully's wrote:MaxPower wrote:People believe this stuff because they want to, a normal distribution isn't going to change the things they want.
Same from both sides bc I've been down that path with the Charlies on this site...give them a season they say it's not 50 seasons...give them 500 seasons and they say "but what if we looked at another 500"....
One path you have never taken is a data path, you always take the path lined with grapes.
You know Charlie, a long time but apparently only posted twice guy, Mr Zamboni, weighed in after years to give us a gem in the other thread. And he suggests it is thick-headedness here, so I will have to agree with Max--the hypothesis being offered is safe from every proof because it is a belief, not a deduction. In that sense, I think it is trolling as an art form, not really wanting to achieve anything except disagreement.