How many HRs every park HR 1-19 and no pitchers over 1 mil?

Link fixed. An = sign is needed after the "l" of the first [url].

https://365.strat-o-matic.com/league/stats/players/batting/460182/all/hr/1

thanks for the assist!

https://365.strat-o-matic.com/team/1683000

Relievers are better than starters at 1MM. so with the unlimited cap you get to relievers faster and more of them for situational pitching. Cutting down on the home runs. As you can see on your team your starters gave up 308 home runs in 637.6 innings while your relievers gave up 299 in 794 innings. Starters giving up .483 HR per inning vs .377 for relievers. Cutting down Home runs for relievers by starters by 22 percent.

I'm on pins and needles waiting to find out what Salty thinks is going on here. Several of those Chicks leagues linked earlier also had only two players with over 100 homers. Perhaps the "explanation" is "the cards are performing within the range of expectations"?

I'm on pins and needles waiting to find out what Salty thinks is going on here. Several of those Chicks leagues linked earlier also had only two players with over 100 homers. Perhaps the "explanation" is "the cards are performing within the range of expectations"?

Yeah- except not EVERY stadium was HR 1-19 so try again-
Is it just a bit too much for you to stop making comparisons that are purposely different?

https://365.strat-o-matic.com/team/1683000

Relievers are better than starters at 1MM. so with the unlimited cap you get to relievers faster and more of them for situational pitching. Cutting down on the home runs. As you can see on your team your starters gave up 308 home runs in 637.6 innings while your relievers gave up 299 in 794 innings. Starters giving up .483 HR per inning vs .377 for relievers. Cutting down Home runs for relievers by starters by 22 percent.

LMMFAO-
Please THINK before you open your mouth yeah?
This is absurdly bad and incorrect logic.
You are trying to compare apples to peaches -- its not about how many MORE HRs were given up by the SPs at all
YEESH DUDE
YOU DONT GET TO THE RPs UNTIL THE SPS HAVE BEEN CHASED OUT
AND
THEY ARE STILL THE WORST RPS
AND
THE PARKS ARE STILL MASSIVE HR PLACES
LITERALLY YOU CANT HAVE A MORE HITTING FRIENDLY CHOICE HERE

I'm on pins and needles waiting to find out what Salty thinks is going on here. Several of those Chicks leagues linked earlier also had only two players with over 100 homers. Perhaps the "explanation" is "the cards are performing within the range of expectations"?

Yeah- except not EVERY stadium was HR 1-19 so try again-
Is it just a bit too much for you to stop making comparisons that are purposely different?

Don't know how much difference it made, but when the ATG prices changed it took pitchers such as favorite Ernie Koob above the threshold and out of the league.

I'm on pins and needles waiting to find out what Salty thinks is going on here. Several of those Chicks leagues linked earlier also had only two players with over 100 homers. Perhaps the "explanation" is "the cards are performing within the range of expectations"?

Yeah- except not EVERY stadium was HR 1-19 so try again-
Is it just a bit too much for you to stop making comparisons that are purposely different?

Every stadium in those leagues is extremely hitter friendly. Just opening the first league that had only 2 hitters reach 100 homers and the HR factors are:

19/18
17/20
20/20
19/19
20/20
17/20
17/19
17/20
19/18
20/20
19/19
18/18

https://365.strat-o-matic.com/league/440124

That seems not very different from 19/19 x12? I'm still not clear on what your theory even is here...

I'm on pins and needles waiting to find out what Salty thinks is going on here. Several of those Chicks leagues linked earlier also had only two players with over 100 homers. Perhaps the "explanation" is "the cards are performing within the range of expectations"?

Yeah- except not EVERY stadium was HR 1-19 so try again-
Is it just a bit too much for you to stop making comparisons that are purposely different?

Every stadium in those leagues is extremely hitter friendly. Just opening the first league that had only 2 hitters reach 100 homers and the HR factors are:

19/18
17/20
20/20
19/19
20/20
17/20
17/19
17/20
19/18
20/20
19/19
18/18

https://365.strat-o-matic.com/league/440124

That seems not very different from 19/19 x12? I'm still not clear on what your theory even is here...

Yep thats one league- and its honestly not worth my time or energy rehashing stuff with you- sorry, just find it becomes a tautological urinating contest which holds zero interest.

Here is the 2nd league with only 2 hitters over 100 homers:

17/20
20/20
19/19
20/20
18/18
20/20
18/18
19/19
20/20
19/19
18/18
18/18

https://365.strat-o-matic.com/league/450369

So we have established that when you replied to me "Yeah- except not EVERY stadium was HR 1-19 so try again- Is it just a bit too much for you to stop making comparisons that are purposely different?" I was not in fact "making comparisons that are purposely different" and the leagues in question average very close to 19/19, meaning your reply was both incorrect as well as pointlessly bitchy.

At any rate, I appreciate you refraining from polluting the boards with your conspiracy nonsense again, thank you for showing some restraint at the last moment.

Salty , I have files with player and team detail for nine seasons. If you’re interested in digging deeper, send me a PM with an email.