- Posts: 166
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 9:44 am
I'm questioning the arb3 extensions given to Soto and Buehler. Section 9.10(b) of the rules describes the 5 year minimum length at the average 25%. But then the next paragraph says if a player has a salary that exceeds this structure, he can be extended at the current (higher) salary. Therefore Sota should be extended at $8.89 M instead of $7.772 M, and Buhler at $6.26 M rather than $6.033 M. There could be others that I missed.
For clarification, it does not appear that the higher salary amount applies to a 4 year extension, as it is not mentioned in Section 9.10(a), and the additional paragraph under 9.10(b) only mentions 5 year extensions. Is that correct?
Nice catch. The rule, while it follows the Arb3 signing rule, is meant to apply to all contract extensions. Any player being offered a contract extension can be signed for no less than their existing salary. I will look at every contract and make sure they are correct.
Phil