- Posts: 1136
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:16 pm
Hack Wilson wrote:I'd like to see Jim Edmonds 2003 -- second best season for him after that awesome 2004 card. Stats below:
2003 33 STL NL 137 531 447 89 123 32 2 39 89 1 3 77 127 .275 .385 .617 1.002 160
Lots of great Edmonds cards to consider that are different. Right now we have two, at 2R and E. The 2003 you mention (1.007 OPS) gives him a 1 in CF AND LF 1(-2)7 and is a 3R.
2002 (.981 OPS) is a CF 1(-1)6, but a much higher OBP than 2003 (420 vs 385).
Also 2001 (.974 OPS) CF 1(-1)7, 1b410, but a 5R.
Or a California card? 1996 (.946 OPS) 6R, but a CF2(-2)2
Or a cheap 8R? 2006 (.821 OPS) CF2(-2)5 1b425?
Or a 3L? 2005 (.918 OPS) CF1(-2)3
All would be interesting choices. Good topic!