1964 LOU BROCK (STL STATS ONLY)

BRAND NEW CARD: REMOVE THE 1964 CUBS STATS ON A SPECIAL NEW CARD.

I WOULD ALSO LIKE A WHOLE CARD SET BASED ON players WORLD SERIES/playoff STATS WITH ENOUGH ABs, IPs, TO QUALIFY. Maybe one American & one National League team of them? Weighted so World Series stats count a bit more than other playoff games?

BRAND NEW CARD: REMOVE THE 1964 CUBS STATS ON A SPECIAL NEW CARD.

I WOULD ALSO LIKE A WHOLE CARD SET BASED ON players WORLD SERIES/playoff STATS WITH ENOUGH ABs, IPs, TO QUALIFY. Maybe one American & one National League team of them? Weighted so World Series stats count a bit more than other playoff games?

So you want a Billy Hatcher card from 1990 when he hit .800?
George Springer 5 HRs in 34 PAs?

Maybe that's not what you mean. I'm only 1 person, but I'd never join a league with that set of cards.
Makes Gates Brown seem downright realistic.

"stats enough to qualify" 600 playoff ABs? Yogi leads at 295, and he's not getting any more.

Flesh this out for us so that it makes sense. You may have a good idea in your head, but you haven't transferred it to the forum here.

1964 was the year when the Cubs traded Brock to the Cardinals.

Here are the stats with each team...

1964 25 CHC NL 52 231 215 30 54 9 2 2 14 10 3 13 40 .251 .300 .340 .640 77 73 3 2 1 0 0 9/8H
1964 25 STL NL 103 464 419 81 146 21 9 12 44 33 15 27 87 .348 .387 .527 .915 146 221 2 2 12 4 0 7/98H

from Baseball Reference.

One can see that Brock had much better stats following the trade. However, in Strato, the 1964 card reflects the cumulative with both teams. If a special card focused on just the Cardinal stats was developed, that would be a monster card with a 0.915 OPS.

think Sutcliffe had a similar card year 20 years later in 1984. went 4-5 with Indians then got traded to the Cubs and went 16-1 in a 150 innings. I think they should both be in the set. Brock would have to be a 2/3 IR and Sutcliffe a non*SP starter. guess you have a play offs only card set but with their own league/set