Thu Sep 19, 2024 1:24 pm
So I'm thinking about throwing out a rule change vote but before I do wanted to see what the league feels generally.
Two things that are fundamentally true:
A) Due to Eddie's tweaks in our drafting/supplemental/prospecting, etc... there is now more talent generally available on the FA and Prospect lists for us to draft from.
B) It seems like 99% of pitchers are getting TJ these days and I think it creates some real roster crunch issues for a lot of us. Okay, maybe more like 25%, but it's a lot...
So, the rule I was thinking about proposing (rough form here, looking for input/reaction/concensus...), is creating a DL spot on the roster, essentially a "21st" protected player, but one who would only qualify by A) not being carded, and B) the not carding due to injury. This would allow someone who appeared but didn't make the inning threshold a protected player (i.e. Kodai Senga this year as an example of a player who would qualify for the IL spot, likely will pitch a couple innings but not be carded). This would NOT cover someone who just spent the season in the minors (maybe even a caveat that someone with more than 60 innings pitched in the minors would not qualify... this would allow a guy like DeGrom or Kershaw to be protected even though they had some ramp up work, but maybe not a guy who gets called up in August then shut down after 2 starts...)
I'm thinking about throwing this out in all leagues I'm in because it's becoming such a big deal. Since we implemented some of Eddie's rules, I think there is more than enough talent out there so that we can do this and still balance roster protection and protect our players. Also seems more like "real" baseball to me, basically a 60 Day DL spot that lasts the whole year and doesn't take up a roster spot in the real game.
Thoughts and discussion???