Strat-O-Matic Baseball 365

george barnard wrote:

scorehouse wrote:there's 3 pages of Switch-Hitting Short Stops. most never will be used due to Fielding. historically. with the AB/PA nom requirement, don't know if there are that many LHB SS's left in MLB database?

Here are three lh ss for those not adverse to using unknown names...no guarantee as to defense...

1884 Jack Rowe
1887 Sam Wise
1891 Frank Shugart

BC15NY wrote:Thanks Bill.

I was looking at the Sam Wise card in the viewer last night. It is a good offensive card. Should be an e36 at worst. From what I've seen Strat usually cuts the e-rating down to somewhere between 42% and 50% of the historical e-rating when it normalizes them for players from the early days of baseball.

To clarify, I'm not opposed to players I've never heard of, just those that had such short careers that seem overly obscure. (Not so much opposed, as just less likely to vote for).

Also, the 1887 John 'Monte' Ward SS card looks like a major upgrade. Better offensively, a 1 on defense, and AAA stealing. (I know we don't use those ratings, but they are a good indicator).

Another upgrade would be 1891 Herman Long. Gets a 1 on defense at SS, with better offense and a AA base stealer.

Salty wrote:

BC15NY wrote:Thanks Bill.

I was looking at the Sam Wise card in the viewer last night. It is a good offensive card. Should be an e36 at worst. From what I've seen Strat usually cuts the e-rating down to somewhere between 42% and 50% of the historical e-rating when it normalizes them for players from the early days of baseball.

To clarify, I'm not opposed to players I've never heard of, just those that had such short careers that seem overly obscure. (Not so much opposed, as just less likely to vote for).

Also, the 1887 John 'Monte' Ward SS card looks like a major upgrade. Better offensively, a 1 on defense, and AAA stealing. (I know we don't use those ratings, but they are a good indicator).

Another upgrade would be 1891 Herman Long. Gets a 1 on defense at SS, with better offense and a AA base stealer.

I'll take a look when i get a chance.

Can we see the strat stats on those and add them to the list of potentials?

Salty wrote:

BC15NY wrote:Thanks Bill.

I was looking at the Sam Wise card in the viewer last night. It is a good offensive card. Should be an e36 at worst. From what I've seen Strat usually cuts the e-rating down to somewhere between 42% and 50% of the historical e-rating when it normalizes them for players from the early days of baseball.

To clarify, I'm not opposed to players I've never heard of, just those that had such short careers that seem overly obscure. (Not so much opposed, as just less likely to vote for).

Also, the 1887 John 'Monte' Ward SS card looks like a major upgrade. Better offensively, a 1 on defense, and AAA stealing. (I know we don't use those ratings, but they are a good indicator).

Another upgrade would be 1891 Herman Long. Gets a 1 on defense at SS, with better offense and a AA base stealer.

Can we see the strat stats on those and add them to the list of potentials?

andycummings65 wrote:

Salty wrote:

BC15NY wrote:Thanks Bill.

I was looking at the Sam Wise card in the viewer last night. It is a good offensive card. Should be an e36 at worst. From what I've seen Strat usually cuts the e-rating down to somewhere between 42% and 50% of the historical e-rating when it normalizes them for players from the early days of baseball.

To clarify, I'm not opposed to players I've never heard of, just those that had such short careers that seem overly obscure. (Not so much opposed, as just less likely to vote for).

Also, the 1887 John 'Monte' Ward SS card looks like a major upgrade. Better offensively, a 1 on defense, and AAA stealing. (I know we don't use those ratings, but they are a good indicator).

Another upgrade would be 1891 Herman Long. Gets a 1 on defense at SS, with better offense and a AA base stealer.

Cool- that Sam Wise card looks to have the most potential use -- depending on the error rating


Can we see the strat stats on those and add them to the list of potentials?

Check the link below:
https://forum-365.strat-o-matic.com/com ... b#p5920388

scorehouse wrote:When will voting end? anyone know when all the Additions already in the bank will be added? thanks