2006 Ballpark Success Rates - now available

[Play By The Rules]

There will be no more extreme right or left parks this year. Nothing with more than a +3 differential in BPHR from one side to another. Ought to change strategies a lot.

[visick]

Thanks PBTR... :lol:

[Play By The Rules]

Champs:

http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/baseball/stratomatic/2006/team/team_other.html?user_id=13867

http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/baseball/stratomatic/2006/team/team_other.html?user_id=10871

Finals losers:

http://fantasygames.sportingnews.com/baseball/stratomatic/2006/team/team_other.html?user_id=12485

Got a team in the playoffs now but not going to jinx it.

[visick]

The closer by committee theory huh?


If I had more testosterone, I'd try that out... :lol:

[BRADSANDBOTHE]

Hmm,

Busch has the lowest winning %........I wonder if that is because I tend to play there quite a bit. :evil: :twisted:

Only one of my 6 Busch teams went to the playoffs.

Combined record of 417-441 (one team is still playing)

That actually is slightly above the .479 winning%,

Mine is .486

[MonsterT]

Was the difference in winning percentages statistically significant or could the differences be explained by chance randomness?!

[unclerowser]

Any chance of the same type of ballpark analysis for ATGIII?

[tersignf]

One should aslo consider that most vets typically prefer and play in unbalanced parks (either R/L or HR/No HR) which certainly is another dependency on the data.

The choice of ballpark is not an independent variable.

[cristano11]

yah buy play by the rules is playing all autoleagues against managers where u can stack 9 LHB and let it ride... you cant get away with that in sanctioned events...

[The Turtle]

I have a feeling that statement by cristano will go over as well as his last statement :roll: