by Jablowmi » Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:13 am
I am generally against a change, however, if there is one, I don't think it should be drastic. To me, 4 players w/ no cap is a drastic change. I was thinking of two things when I brought it up: (1) using pick 3 lottery #s to select the order and then allowing a selection of any ONE player; or (2) using pick 3 lottery #s to select the order and then allowing a cap of $6M for unlimited players, which must be used by some set time (i.e., if we do the lottery after game 42, all changes must be in by game 48). Opening it up to 4 unlimited selections drastically affects the teams as they now stand and is extraordinarily counter to the original plan. Also, I think this is one where we may need more than a simple majority.