Back to the 60's / Babyboomer's League

Back to the 60's / Babyboomer's League

Postby Free Radicals » Mon Jan 09, 2006 1:30 pm

I was wondering if this has ever been done . Only use players from basically the 60's teams . Each player takes a park in the league , no repeats. So each park is unique to the league (determining how to do this not yet determined) . You can ONLY gets players from these teams . No 3 Fingers or Pete's .

Bal '70
Bos '67
Cubs '59
Sox '59
Det '68
La '65
Min '65
NYM '69
SF '62
StL '64
Pit '71

That's 11 and the closest others are Mil '57 and Oak '73. We could get a consensus on the last park. Whatcha think ? Crazy ...nutty...different ? :D

1. Von
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Free Radicals
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby raslavens » Mon Jan 09, 2006 1:33 pm

I think not enough teams. Why don't you do 60s and 70s or 60s on up? That would create more interest and make it more feasible to field a decent team.
raslavens
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby Free Radicals » Mon Jan 09, 2006 1:37 pm

Sure would make draft day interesting at least .
Free Radicals
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby childsmwc » Mon Jan 09, 2006 1:56 pm

I have run and played in similar themes that try and limit the player pool to a specific ERA. I would suggest that you need atleast 13 and probably 14 teams in your player pool to make the draft work.

This are very fun and you definitely use an entire group of guys that would normally never play in ATGII,

Bbrool
childsmwc
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby errormagnate » Mon Jan 09, 2006 1:56 pm

I like it and I'd do it probably better as a live draft and I would think Oak'73 is more of a 60's team than the '57 Braves. But then again '57 was the quintessential Esinhower era baby boomer year.
errormagnate
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

60's

Postby rschwartz51 » Mon Jan 09, 2006 1:59 pm

I've seen Theme Leagues use this concept (ie; Battle of the ERA's) where you play each era as separate league. This along with a league I ran for 3 seasons which used 12 separate Teams which combined Teams which had common aspects. Yankees, Cards, Dodgers, etc.

In the times your theme came up there seemed to be the end result that it was best to use $100M salary cap in order to use the stars of the period. The period most often was either 1950-1972 or 1957-1972. Most managers rejected adding teams past 1980 but that is a possibility.

I would be very interested if 1956 & 1957 teams were at least included.
rschwartz51
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby Free Radicals » Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:16 pm

Well how about 1950-1975 . There's an era that's still considered Babyboomer. Like I said Its not etched in stone and was looking for imput . We can toss is Cle '54 , Yanks '56 , Shibe '50 , Cin '75, Oak '73 , plus all meantioned earlier and then its a pool of 18 teams . I do believe the 1969 game is only 18-20 teams .
Free Radicals
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby memphisjohn » Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:48 pm

If this helps, technically the Baby Boomer generation was born from 1946-1964. So you could rationalize the two 1946 teams...
memphisjohn
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm


Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: All-Time Greats

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests