yet another gb(x)=single with "1" fielder question

yet another gb(x)=single with "1" fielder question

Postby ClowntimeIsOver » Thu Oct 02, 2008 6:43 pm

*** BOTTOM OF INNING 1 ***
0 R.Carew 4-10 Single (3B) b-1 gb(3B)x
0 1 B.Powell 2-8 Ground Out (1B) Double Play 1-o b-0
2 M.Ott 2-9 Home Run (RF) b-H bpHR 1-20
2 B.Ruth 5-4 Foul Out (2B) b-0 bpSI 0

Brooks Robinson at third, 1e14.

Infield not in. No one on. Was this just one of those special "extraordinary" online plays? Is Carew's speed a factor? Guesses?
ClowntimeIsOver
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby fd45678 » Fri Oct 03, 2008 11:15 am

Is Carew a good bunter? My guess is that Hal brought corners in the protect against a bunt hit.
fd45678
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby coyote303 » Fri Oct 03, 2008 11:21 am

[quote:e9c7e55808="fd45678"]Is Carew a good bunter? My guess is that Hal brought corners in the protect against a bunt hit.[/quote:e9c7e55808]

What fd said is what I was going to say.
coyote303
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby RICHARDMILTER » Sat Oct 04, 2008 7:02 am

Rod Carew was an A bunter.
RICHARDMILTER
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm


Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball Online 20xx

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron