by thisisdan26 » Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:03 pm
[quote:b3ffcd68aa="Roscodog"][quote:b3ffcd68aa="Paul_Long71"]Rosco,
I had Harper, Trout, Hosmer, and I figured I'd take Pineda 4th(great for next year already) then Kramer's threw a curve in there with Britton (thought he'd be 5,6,or 7 but another guy that can be used next year in a rotation). So...I took Trout and now I'll wait til who knows how long before I ever use him in this league....lots of quality guys for the first 3 rounds at least.
Paul[/quote:b3ffcd68aa]
I had Harper #1 obviously and then really wasn't sure about the order of Trout, Pineda, Britton, and Hosmer I knew the only way one of them was making it past me, was if there was 2 of them available somehow. I would have been happy with any of them at #5 really, hard to go wrong with any of them. In a way I was happy I had the 5th pick so I didn't have to make the decision (unless I could have had the 1st)
[/quote:b3ffcd68aa]
I was thinking exactly the same thing...obviously Harper #1...but after him it was those same guys that I was between. I had it narrowed down to Pineda, Hosmer, and Trout. I figured, since I drafted pretty heavily towards pitching for now and the future in the initial draft, Pineda wasn't exactly a necessity. So down to Hosmer and Trout...other than the fact that Im pretty slim @ 1B and my plan all along was to take Hosmer #2... I still liked Trout ALOT. But, I grow sort of wary of those prospects with 2+years ETA. A lot seems to happen for the guys that "still need to develop" in the minors, and I have to say, I've had a lot of high profile, young guys, turn into complete busts.
Not saying that Trout will be a bust, because I definitely would have taken him if I was slotted 3-6ish, but I just like the "mlb ready" prospects.