by OakAth72 » Fri Oct 21, 2011 4:31 pm
[quote:64f70aeda7="jet40"][quote:64f70aeda7="OakAth72"]If you want a true showing of the top talent at the 100 mil level you should probably consider the winning percentages of the 100 mil level only. I guarantee your list will look different as some of the managers shed the tougher higher capped leagues that figure into their totals.[/quote:64f70aeda7]
Are you sure?
My % [b:64f70aeda7]increased[/b:64f70aeda7] by 11 points.[/quote:64f70aeda7]
I'll use myself as an example. This thread forced me to do some math.....my record in ATG VI at 100 mil is 1860-1542 or a .547 winning percentage. Factor in 140 mil and 200 mil and my percentage shows a significant decrease. I am assuming that you are saying that you show an 11% increase in winning percentage when just considering your 100 mil teams? If so, you have proven my point which is a lot of managers sitting at .530 and lower would have much higher averages if only taking 100 mil into consideration. Some of the teams playing within this theme play strictly at the 100 mil level with very few teams to boot, thus creating an overall higher ATG VI winning percentage.