Paging PKBlack Enter your team - Theme League - ERA vs. ERA!

[JohnnyBlazers]

[quote:7b4eb7d6e9="PotKettleBlack"][quote:7b4eb7d6e9="johnnyblazers"][quote:7b4eb7d6e9="honestiago"]Most of the '78 parks were still in use in the 80s. [b:7b4eb7d6e9]How about we say the park has to actually be in use during the decade? [/b:7b4eb7d6e9]Because I think there's a lot of decades without parks, and constraining managers to one park choice gives other managers an unfair advantage.[/quote:7b4eb7d6e9]

I agree with you - let's go that route instead.

For the NEL teams and the lack of relievers - how about any relievers left over after the draft are fair game for the NEL teams only?

Regarding the CAP - I like the 100 Cap idea - I think going 120 will give the modern teams too much of an advantage in regards to power hitting vs. the earlier era teams, however, if we can get a consensus on this issue, we can go the way that the masses want.[/quote:7b4eb7d6e9]

Hrm: My 20's team.

Let's see. 120 allows me to use the 15M Ruth with pretty much roster impunity. I can put together a 100M roster minus a LF/DH/1B, then add Ruth and $5M. I like.

The 1909 and before all stars can put together a .400 hitting outfield/dh rotation at 120, with some legit shut down starters.

The 10-19... hrm. They might have problems at the 120. Probably not. Add pitching as some of the best pitchers in the set...

30's... hitting decade. No problem.

I wouldn't worry about the early teams keeping up. Maybe not in isoP, but in TB, I think they can hang. I know the Roaring 20s can.[/quote:7b4eb7d6e9]

Okay, let's do 120 - I haven't had a chance to really look at it, but you convinced me.

[carr20]

1) 1800's-1910 - OakAth72
2) 1911-1919
3) 1920-1929 - PKBlack
4) 1930-1939 - mrharryc
5) 1940-1949
6) 1950-1959
7) 1960-1969 - johnnyblazers
8) 1970-1979 - carr20
9) 1980-1989 - honestiago
10) 1990-present - Modmark
11) Negro Leagues-I
12) Negro Leagues II

[JohnnyBlazers]

private league, password ERA (lower case)

[JohnnyBlazers]

Made cap 140 - do we go 140 or 120? Seems like more fun at 140 but if some feel their teams wouldn't be competitive then we can go to 120. The only way you will now what your team will look like is as you fill the draft card.

[gfg001]

[quote:d2c11c1efb="carr20"]1) 1800's-1910 - OakAth72
2) 1911-1919 gfg001
3) 1920-1929 - PKBlack
4) 1930-1939 - mrharryc
5) 1940-1949
6) 1950-1959
7) 1960-1969 - johnnyblazers
8) 1970-1979 - carr20
9) 1980-1989 - honestiago
10) 1990-present - Modmark
11) Negro Leagues-I
12) Negro Leagues II[/quote:d2c11c1efb]

[lanier64]

[quote:c7b7822a7e="gfg001"][quote:c7b7822a7e="carr20"]1) 1800's-1910 - OakAth72
2) 1911-1919 gfg001
3) 1920-1929 - PKBlack
4) 1930-1939 - mrharryc
5) 1940-1949
6) 1950-1959 -lanier64
7) 1960-1969 - johnnyblazers
8) 1970-1979 - carr20
9) 1980-1989 - honestiago
10) 1990-present - Modmark
11) Negro Leagues-I
12) Negro Leagues II[/quote:c7b7822a7e][/quote:c7b7822a7e]

[honestiago1]

I thought 100M was fine. Have to make some choices between pitching/hitting. Give me 120, and I can have things like Brett at 3B and Schmidt DH'ing. Not that that's a BAD thing, mind...

[gfg001]

Is there reason that all the decades start at 0 ( 1920',1930,1940 etc) except for the teens 1911 to 1919?

[JohnnyBlazers]

[quote:2fb3961edc="gfg001"]Is there reason that all the decades start at 0 ( 1920',1930,1940 etc) except for the teens 1911 to 1919?[/quote:2fb3961edc]

mistake on my part.

[JohnnyBlazers]

1) 1800's-1909 - OakAth72
2) 1910-1919 gfg001
3) 1920-1929 - PKBlack
4) 1930-1939 - mrharryc
5) 1940-1949
6) 1950-1959 -lanier64
7) 1960-1969 - johnnyblazers
8) 1970-1979 - carr20
9) 1980-1989 - honestiago
10) 1990-present - Modmark
11) Negro Leagues-I
12) Negro Leagues II

need three more!