ATG new cards batch #5 debuts 1/30/12

Postby george barnard » Mon Jan 23, 2012 3:44 pm

[img:fb00447081]http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Ly8Lm_KBf_o/TZEovAZDkYI/AAAAAAAAA-E/WfZy7LsQh84/s1600/Billy+Punching+Jim+Brewer.jpg[/img:fb00447081]

On the other hand, it looks like Jim Brewer and Billy Martin could do a pretty mean disco.
george barnard
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby visick » Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:16 pm

Hello Hilltop Mr. Brewer... :lol:
visick
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby macnole » Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:13 am

[quote:6c67215786="dharmabums"]I really want one for Mac.[/quote:6c67215786]
second that
aint running parallels to run strat
macnole
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby macnole » Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:14 am

nice Bernie.
Hey trying to only bump the civil threads!

Alas, a moving target.
macnole
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Re: Teasers Part the Seventh

Postby ADRIANGABRIEL » Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:17 pm

[quote:58af6e1338="bernieh"]It's one thing to over-simplify the effort that goes into my job, but let's not trivialize Bbrool's masterful work. If it were that easy, it'd be done by now, either by him, or by me. A lot of effort goes into this, best done by Bbrool as the most qualified person, with time that I don't have.[/quote:58af6e1338]
Forgive me if it appeared I "trivialized Bbrool's masterful work." That was not my intent. However, things don't get done because they are easy, but rather because they are made a priority.

So this is not a priority. Got it.
ADRIANGABRIEL
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby nevdully's » Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:51 pm

And why give him 27,000 cards to price at once? Why not these 20 and then 26,980 more.?
nevdully's
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby drfreeze49 » Wed Jan 25, 2012 4:24 pm

[quote:4f83bd2b91="nevdully's"]And why give him 27,000 cards to price at once? Why not these 20 and then 26,980 more.?[/quote:4f83bd2b91]



...because that would be logical Mr Spock...... :D
drfreeze49
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby Stormcrow2012 » Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:53 am

In response to Valen asking me about stealing settings and the CD-ROM:

I just noticed that you asked me about stealing and the CD-ROM. Sorry I did not notice it earlier. I play a lot of CD-ROM games almost everyday and when Hal or the computer manager is set on "Conservative" for stealing a lot of times he will not run even with a 70%, 75% or even 80% chance of success. That is why if I have a team that can run I always set them to "Normal" or "Aggressive" and I am still able to get as high a success rate as with the "Conservative" setting and a lot more bases are stolen. I also always set my base running to "Aggressive" otherwise Hal is way too conservative
Stormcrow2012
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby Valen » Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:05 am

Thank you stormcrow. That information is very appreciated. :D

Any insight at all in to how these labels translate to numbers/odds is a great contribution and has been the subject of many wishes on these boards.
Valen
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby PotKettleBlack » Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:45 am

Second Level Questions on the baserunning settings for Stormcrow:

The more aggressive setting translates to similar success and more frequent stealing. Got that.

First: Is this observation based on an environment with a lot of plus plus catchers (ala ATG or the 70's game) or an average assortment of catchers (like any given year or the 90s).

Second: Does additional base stealing with the Normal to Aggressive setting translate to more winning?
PotKettleBlack
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Strat-O-Matic Baseball: All-Time Greats

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests

cron