Palmtana wrote:Cease/Buehler trade
No one has questioned this trade but it got me to thinking. I have a difficult time determining if a trade is fair….kinda fair….one-sided….So I thought I would put down my thoughts on this one as a virtual sounding board for your own trades.
Neither Buehler or Cease will have a playable card next year. No advantage for Ernie or me.
The future: Cease has had 1 good season out of his 5 in the Majors. Buehler is 4 for 5. Point for me.
Season 2 lineups: Ernie gets Cease for 90 games to improve his chances at a ring. I’ll have a lower RV which will somewhat improve my chances for a higher pick in the FA Draft. Point for Ernie.
Ernie gets Bard (38) for 90 games for a Ring Run. I get Brash who is 13 years younger and, despite the fact that he will often walk the bases full, will have a playable card next year. A wash.
So, from my point of view, this trade had no losers. Only winners depending on the time frame.
Is that me hearing no-one asking for my opinion? Well then...
I think it's a win-win. Future value for win-now is always the easiest way to create value on both sides. Some people know this (and several have experienced it in my trade offers and how I present them) but a big part of my current job is acting as a mediator for collective bargaining agreements between Unions and Employers. So I always take the viewpoint of the win-win (in my job, and in Strat), I try to identify risk where it lies and value (or de-value) a portion of a trade based on the risk a certain player has (i.e. injury history or prospects generally, not every top prospect is going to the Hall of Fame guys, just ask me and how I went ALL IN on Asa Lacy a couple years ago, cough cough...), and then bake that into a trade, try to find future value in prospect projections, all that jazz. Sean can tell you we've had some trades that have been questioned in other leagues we are in, and I would say 80% of them a year later look like the "loser" of the trade came out way ahead.
I like this trade for both you guys.