Last year, I compiled data in an attempt to predict the Top 25 most valuable Strat starting pitchers for 2009 as soon as the season was over. I successfully predicted 8 of the top 10 and 22 of the top 25 with remarkably similar order to TSN. I'm not telling you this to toot my own horn, but to say that the system I used seems to be a pretty accurate predictor. And many asked me to do it again this year. I didn't get around to it until now. Some notes and the data explanation are below the list. Here they are, with stamina ratings and stars* included:
1 Ubaldo Jimenez, S7*
2 Cliff Lee, S7*
3 Adam Wainwright, S7*
4 Roy Oswalt, S7*
5 Felix Hernandez, S7*
6 Daniel Hudson, S7
7 Jered Weaver, S7*
8 Justin Verlander, S7*
9 Roy Halladay, S7*
10 Matt Cain, S7*
11 Jon Lester, S7*
12 Josh Johnson, S7
13 Trevor Cahill, S7*
14 CC Sabathia, S7*
15 John Danks, S7*
16 Tim Hudson, S7*
17 Stephen Strasburg, S6
18 Clayton Kershaw, S6*
19 Johan Santana, S7*
20 C.J. Wilson, S6*
21 David Price, S7*
22 Colby Lewis, S6*
23 Ricky Romero, S7*
24 Hideki Kuroda S6*
25 Travis Wood, S6
26 Bronson Arroyo, S7*
Notes:
1. The data is compiled using [b:8850255458]ERC[/b:8850255458] as the base (not ERA). ERC is the predicted ERA of a pitcher based on his raw data--not his actual ERA. This baseline ERC is then adjusted for the [b:8850255458]Defensive Efficiency[/b:8850255458] of the pitcher's team, the [b:8850255458]Ballpark Effects[/b:8850255458] of his home park, and his [b:8850255458]League[/b:8850255458]. Finally, I estimated the approximate replacement value ERC for this year's set of pitchers and assigned values to each pitcher based on his stamina and star* or no star status. Again, this system was very successfully predictive last year.
2. Trevor Cahill may not get a star*. He only had 30 starts, but managed 196.1 IP. There are many, many borderline star* cases this year. I think HAL will deem 196.1 IP enough for an automatic. If he doesn't get a star*, Cahill's ranking falls to #20 and #14-20 all move up one spot.
3. I don't expect this prediction set to be quite as accurate as last year's. There are many pitchers crammed in the good to very good category, with not many in the great category (I don't expect the top pitcher to be worth more than 8.25M, for example). I expect this group to shuffle some from what I've guessed. As with last year, I didn't take the time to adjust for standard % assignments toward righty/lefty card values. This also effects the integrity of what I've compiled.
4. If you have questions about certain guys, I don't mind answering them. However, you might be able to answer your own questions with a couple of quick checks. Don't forget, these predictions are based on RAW DATA, not ERA or wins and losses or perceived quality. Ubaldo Jimenez is #1 because Coors Field was ultra hitter-oriented, the Rockies didn't play great defense, and Jimenez's raw data suggest he should have had better results than his actual ERA indicates. If you isolate his performance free of things he can't control, you end up with a very high-value pitcher. David Price is #21 because the Trop is very pitcher friendly, the Rays played pretty good defense, and Price's raw data suggest he got a little lucky with his final ERA. These are just two examples. You can find all pitchers' ERC values on ESPN.com if you're curious.
5. Daniel Hudson had the best ERC and adjusted ERC. He obviously didn't get the #1 position because of his lack of a star.